The Price of ‘Knowing’ – a warning to all

06May08

      

     The LHC (or Large Hadron Collider) is a machine that has been built at
a cost of $8.5 Billion dollars over a period of about 14 years. It is
the most complex and advanced device ever built by humans. It is located
about 100km beneath the French-Switzerland border and is in itself 27km
in legnth and 7000 tonnes. This “atom-smasher” as it has been dubbed, is
being built by the European Centre for Nuclear Research (or CERN).

     The purpose of the LHC is to recreate the conditions that existed one
trillionth of a second following the purported “Big Bang”, and in doing
so locate the elusive “Higgs Boson” God-Particle, the missing link
particle that gives all others their mass. Another secret that may be
unlocked is the question of extra-dimensions. By being able to analyze
the very fabric of time and space the scientists at CERN may be able to
discover these dimensions and the mystery behind “dark matter” which
comprises 96% of the entire universe but which we cannot see.

     The process involves smashing protons against one another at nearly the
speed of light to create a mini Big-Bang, which will then give us a
glimpse into a self-created mini-universe. Effectively we will be creating
a galactical ant-farm of unlimited answers and new possibilities.
And playing God in the most literal sense of the term.

     In short, the LHC could very well answer the mysteries of not only the
universe but how we came to be. The LHC is scheduled to be switched on and fully operational this July. The scientific world is eagerly anticipating the roaring to life of the world’s greatest ever experiment, hoping that the remaining gaps in physics can finally be filled.

     But this is at a cost. Two men in particular, Walter Wagner and Luis
Sancho, are well aware of that cost and intend to caution the world. They
filed a lawsuit against CERN (The European Centre for Nuclear Research)
on March 21. Their case is that CERN have not been able to adequately
guarantee that in the process of smashing the atoms and protons together
at such terrifying and unprecedented force, a mini black hole or stranglet (among other apocalyptic scenarios) would not be created. Some veteran physicists who have closely examined the Large Hadron Collider’s function have themselves warned that the risks have been underestimated.

     CERN’s argument is that even if a mini black hole were to be created, it would evaporate instantaneously. They dismiss Wagner and Sancho’s warning as baseless and scare-mongering. Another point CERN makes is that stronger collisions of energy have been taking place on earth and the moon for billions of years, without any consequence. The force of a hypothetical mini black hole would have as much energy/force as a mosquito, says CERN. So even if one were generated, there is no way that it could pose any credible danger to the earth.

     This is all well and good, except for two things, which make CERN’s argument fundamentally flawed. CERN say that cosmic rays with equivelant energy to that of the LHC smash into the earth and moon all the time and have done so over billions of years without any consequence whatsoever, thus making the LHC harmless. Cosmic rays travel too fast to be captured by earth’s gravity. The Collider particles, however, smash head on like a car crash and can be captured by the earth’s gravity, and the laws that govern relativity predict mico black holes would therefore not decay. 

     Secondly, the theory that a hypothetical black hole would evaporate due to Hawking Radiation is also flawed, as there is no evidence to suggest that Hawking Radiation exists, let alone works. Let’s look at the following quotes which have been compiled for the reader’s consideration:

* Dr. Adam D. Helfer: Do black holes radiate? [1] [2] “no compelling theoretical case for or against radiation by black holes“

* Dr. William G. Unruh and Prof. Ralf Schützhold: On the Universality of the Hawking Effect “Therefore, whether real black holes emit Hawking radiation or not remains an open question“

* Prof. V.A. Belinski: On the existence of quantum evaporation of a black hole “quote” “…the effect [Hawking Radiation] does not exist.“ 

     And the next statement is particularly important, considering the source.

     Professor Dr. Otto E. Roessler estimates 50 months Earth accretion time from a single micro black hole captured by Earth’s gravity. This gives us until 2012. That’s IF one of the other several horrors don’t manifest. One of them them is the ”stranglet“, a strange form of matter that attaches itself to anything it touches, ultimately turning the entire land-mass of the earth into a clump of strange matter. I guess we’ll wait and see.

     Now, on a seperate (but eerie) note let us look at this. Whatever happens when the LHC reaches maximum performance in 2012, the following is worth a read.

     There is an ancient 3,500 year old calander called the Mayan Long Count Calander, history’s most accurate astronomical calander, that ends abruptly on December 21, 2012. The Mayans believe this is the beginning of a ‘new cycle’. This very well may have an ominous double-meaning.

     The timing is indeed strange. CERN conclude that the Large Hadron Collider will be at maximum performance in 2012. This said, we should be closest to “filling all the gaps” during that very year. And if we do? The mystery gone. The questions answered. We would have discovered the Grand Unified Theory. The universe will have been explained.

     Worryingly, December 21, 2012 is the exact date that the planets in the solar system allign with the galactic equator (an imaginary line that runs down the centre of the universe). Also, on this exact day, the earth completes its 26,000 year ‘wobble’. The earth will be in a position that puts us in front-row position for extreme Solar-Maximum, an event that, on this scale, may wreak havoc with the ocean conveyor belt. Many astronomers warn that this could expose earth to unsustainable conditions, and possible polar-shift. Both of these scenarios are beyond catastrophic. 

     Some may argue that the coinciding celestial event in 2012 may be cosmically designed to prevent Our Greatest Discovery of All. After all, what would be the fun anymore? 

     Others may just call it coincidence.

     That’s some coincidence.

   -BJH

Thank you for your attention to this.

 

Filed under: Sinister Science   |  Leave a Comment
Tags: CERN, Large Hadron Collider, LHC, physics, Science